Global Sources
Ready to import from China? Find verified suppliers on Global Sources.
Share / Recommend:

China vs.US management: Focus on the fundamental differences

by Andrew Hupert

Chinese view markets as exclusive territory, but IP as universal and free to all. Americans see markets as open but IP as private property. This is a pretty fundamental difference in orientation, and it is not getting better. If anything, the trends are pointing towards further divergence. International managers need a strategy to deal with the legal and commercial differences in the way Chinese and western administrations approach basic business practices.

China: Our territory, your IP

Among Chinese decision makers, IP theft, cloning, and hacking all have a common philosophical root — that the virtual can not be claimed. Ideas are ephemeral and communal. Territory, on the other hand, is distinct, discrete and sovereign. It is completely fitting and proper for the Chinese government to turn away Google – but for the anointed domestic successor to copy their services and clone their products.

Territory – and the right to market within it – can not or should not be shared. China is touchy about its territory and sovereignty – to put it mildly. There are whole categories of products and services – finance, energy, transport, and media to name a few – that are simply closed off (or so heavily regulated that only a handful of giant MNCs could consider getting access).

US: Our IP, everyone’s market

On the American side, however, the trend is moving the other way. Extreme patenting is the new normal. Monsanto has claimed genetics as its own corporate property, and Apple has found a way ring-fence the vague appearance of things. Corporations are people – and get Bill of Rights protections to spend and market unfettered. Americans hate it when other nationalities point this out, but we have waged war and undermined governments for access to markets and natural resources. We believe that markets are supposed to be open (at least to us). Wall St valuations are based on the notion that market expansion should be continuous and eternal – they have already added an S to the BRIC acronym to include (South) Africa.

Managing this is YOUR problem

Apple’s Tim Cook has already seen the writing on the wall and in a bid to keep iTunes from following Google into Sinoblivion has issued the iPology.  Managers from the US operating in China will have to accept the fact that the Mainland market is available to them at Beijing’s whim – and that their IP may be the price of admission from now on. No happily ever after for you.

But Chinese managers’ dreams of expanding globally will also be rocked into the waking US nightmare of patent litigation, infringement cases and defending the “look and feel” of their branded gizmos and gadgets.

Andrew Hupert runs, an online platform that helps the international business community achieve greater success when doing business in China. He also writes He can be reached at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Add comment

Security code

Stay Connected

Get Import from China Headlines by E-mail

Attend the Global Sources Summit

  • For online & Amazon sellers
  • Interactive training led by sourcing & Amazon experts
  • Learn how to source profitably, avoid pitfalls
  • April 17 - 19, 2017 in Hong Kong
  • Co-located with Mobile Electronics and
    Gifts & Home shows

Learn More

Join the Smart China Sourcing Facebook Group
  • Connect with other buyers
  • Ask questions
  • Get advice from experts

Join Group

Join Global Sources on Facebook

Be our fan now for the latest sourcing news, practical sourcing guides and expert advice.

Follow Global Sources on Twitter

We'll keep you updated with tweets on sourcing news, trade resources & more.